SEVERAL YEARS AGO, a major debate raged in the land
concerning a number of intellectual young people who were
stranded in the Andes after a disastrous airplane accident. The
survivors resorted to cannibalism on the bodies of their dead
friends. Otherwise, they would have died of starvation in the
bitter cold mountains of the Andes. Did they do right by
subsisting on the flesh of their fallen comrades? The question
was discussed and argued from coast to coast. As far as
Jewish law is concerned, only three cardinal principles
cannot be violated for the purpose of saving a life--
idolatry, immorality and murder.
There are difficult problems in other fields that present
moral and ethical dilemmas of equal force.
Let us take emet --truth-- as an example. It is
known that emet is one of the basic principles of Judaism. Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel said, "The world is established on
three principles: truth, justice and peace" (Ethics of the Fathers, 1:18).
Please note that truth heads the list.The Psalmist pays special
tribute to the one "who speaks truth in his heart" (Ps. 15:2).
The imprimatur of God is emet (Yoma 69b). Our sages tell
us that when a man will be brought before the heavenly
tribunal on the great Yam Hadin , on the Day of Judgment,
the first question that will be asked of him will be nasata
venatata be-emumah, "Have you been honest and truthful in
your dealings?" (Sabbath 31a).
The question that is asked: is truth an absolute value that
can never be overridden, or are there situations or circumstances
when it can be compromised? There are courses offered at
colleges these days which deal with situational human problems
that occasionally place one in a moral dilemma. What is one to do
when two ethical values come in conflict with one another?
Which one is to give way? This issue is raised in a dramatic
manner in our sidrah . After the passing of Jacob,
the brothers of Joseph became apprehensive and fearful.
"Perhaps Joseph will hate us and will repay us for all
the evil that we have done unto him" (Gen. 50:15). Why
did the brothers suspect: that the old animosity may arise in
the heart of Joseph and that he would deal harshly with them
and avenge all the cruelties that they heaped upon him?
The sages relate, "When they are returning from the burial of
their father, they saw that Joseph went to the pit in which
his brothers had cast him to recite a blessing" (Tanhuma
Vayechi).
As is known, there is a special blessing of gratitude that
one is, obligated to repeat at the place where one has
experienced a miraculous deliverance. When the brothers witnessed
this act of Joseph--that he went out of his way after the funeral
to pray at the pit into which they had cast him almost forty years
before, they began to tremble. They said to one another, "Evidently
Joseph remembers how we have mistreated him and how we have
sold him as a slave, and now that our father is gone, he feels free
to do with us as he pleases." So they sent a message, "Your father
commanded before he died saying, so shall you say unto
Joseph: forgive the transgressions of your brothers" (Ibid. 16-17).
When Joseph heard their words, he wept and assured them that
he would be close to them and support them.
The Talmud deduces from this that mutar lo le-adam
leshanot bidvar ha-shalom, that it is permissible for a man to
deviate (from the truth) on account of peace (Yevamot 65b).
Rashi states, "The brothers deviated (from the truth) because
of peace, for Jacob did not command them thus, since he did
not suspect Joseph" ( Rashi Gen. 50:16).
Thus we are taught that truth is not an absolute vaue;
that when it collides with the ideal of peace, a judicious
decisicn is needed for which the principles and guidelines of
the Torah should be sought.
The halakhah has always dealt with particular
life situations. Truth, the backbone and foundation-stone of society,
has to give way when it threatens shalom , or when it does
violence to the ideals of chessed and rachamin ,
kindness and compassion. While it is wrong to tell an outright lie,
there are circumstances when telling the absolute truth is an act of
cruelty and malice. It would be fiendish, for example, to say
to a young girl that she is ugly to look at, or to a baal-haboste
that her gefilte fish is inedible. It is heartless to say to a
rabbi that his sermons are bad, to a cantor that his singing is out of
tune, or to a sexton that his "reading of the Torah" is artrocious.
While the facts may be true, the elements of chessed and
rachamim are outraged.
Unfortunately there are those who, under the guise of tzidkut --great piety--hurt people needlessly and do violence to the
shalom of a community, and even to shalom-bayit.
To them one should say, "You are not more pious than the sons
of Jacob who did what they had to do because of their desire to
put an end to the suspicions, jealousies and enmities which
brought so much suffering and sorrow to their family.
You do the same. Stop pretending that you are doing what
you do because you believe in telling the absolute truth, even
if it brings misery and pain to others. Be compassionate and
God, in turn, may have compassion on you."
|