THE TEXT of my message is based on a verse in the Torah,
"Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil" (Exod. 23:2).
It is related that one of the outstanding scholars and teachers
of our people, the sainted Chofetz Chayim, once asked a
man he knew why he didn't lead a more decent life, why he.
didn't observe more of the tenets and traditions of his faith.
With a pained look the man replied, "Rabbi, you know quite
well that the majority in our community are no better than I.
Why do you pick on me and expect me to be different from
the rest?" To which the sage retorted, "There may be some
truth to what you say, but let me ask you a few questions.
Tell me, who do you think are in the majority --the unselfish
and good-hearted people or the selfish ones?" The man
thought for a while and said, "Truly good-hearted people
are few indeed. From my observation and experience I know
that the majority is not so good." "Tell me then," the rabbi
persisted, "who do you think are in the majority, those who
consider themselves rich or the poor?" The reply was that
the poor were in the majority "Now, who do you think are
in the majority, the healthy and strong who seldom experience
aches and pains, or the weak and ailing?" The man said
that the weak and ailing were in the majority. "Consider then
the replies you have given to my questions," the sage urged.
"You want to belong to a poor, sick and demoralized majority
when you have the choice of joining the blessed company of
the healthy and morally potent few!"
Why am I mentioning this story? Because the tendency in
our society to follow the crowd is endangering the growth
of ideas and the development of good character. The popular
phrase, "everyone is doing it" causes many to run with the
pack and to stampede with the herd. The desire to follow the
crowd has created the adage, "when in Rome do as the
Romans do." By exploiting this human weakness, advertising
has loomed into a multi-billion dollar business. One is almost
compelled by the mass communication media to wear the
same garments, eat the same foods, read the same books, see
the same movies and plays as the rest of the crowd. How can
one resist the beautiful scenery and pastoral setting in which
a lovely girl lights a cigarette and exhales the smoke into
the dreamy eyes of a tall and handsome college athlete? One
feels like dropping everything and rushing out to buy several
cartons of that brand! And this despite the warning on the
wrappers of cigarette boxes that smoking may be a hazard to
one's health.
One may argue that there are areas where there is no harm
in following the crowd. What is wrong with the desire to be
up-to-date in matters of fashion or style? Some even maintain
that the urge to conform is all to the good, for it has a beneficial
effect on the economy of the land. It promotes business and
helps keep the wheels of industry moving by creating mass
production of goods and services. The beer, cola, toothpaste
and clothing we use are less costly because of the power of
mass communications media which guide the prevailing tastes,
practices and styles.
While this argument may or may not hold in the economic
sphere, it is definitely detrimental where religious and moral
issues are involved. There the policy of following the crowd
can corrupt the intellectual and spirtual fiber, first of the
individual and then of the nation.
Young people, in particular, are frequently victimized by
these slogans. There are all sorts of subtle group pressures
that are at work to force them to conform. There is the
pressure of sociability, the desire not to be different, the fear
of being called a poor sport, a "square" or "kill-joy." The
dread of being left out in the cold by one's peers has caused
a number of young men and women to drink hard liquor,
smoke marijuana, use dangerous drugs and make compromises
with standards of ethics and sex.
A young man expressed to his parents the desire to go on
an extended trip with a group of young people of shady
repute. When the parents were reluctant to permit him to go,
the young man protested. "Don't you trust me that I will not
be misled by them?" His father picked a dead coal from
hearth and handed it to his son. When the young man took
it, the palm of his hand became soiled. "See," said the father.
"Even when they do not burn, coals blacken. And so it is
with evil companions."
There is no getting away from the fact that bad associates
"soil" our character, and that it is no easy matter to stand
against the crowd. It tests one's fortitude and moral fiber; it
calls for the kind of courage that the soldier needs on the field
of battle. It requires a dedication to a great faith and a great
cause. But the alternative is disastrous. It spells moral flabbiness
and even physical ruin. Those who succumb to the line of
least resistance are in for a bad time. They remind me of the
scene I watched while standing on a bridge. Broken boards and
pieces of wood were drifting down the stream, transferred by
the current from one eddy to another, only to end up to rot in
a stagnant pool.
What brought about the downfall of ancient Sodom? The
Talmud relates that in order to discourage visits from
strangers, the citizens of that sinful city made a special bed in
which a visitor to their community was made to fit. If his feet
were too long, they were brutally shortened. If they were too
short, they were pulled to fit the bed (Sanh. 109b; Niddah 69a).
Intellectually and spiritually speaking, a great many people
live in Sodom. Modern man is expected to fit the bed of
society. Ideals and values have been standardized and
stereotyped to the extent that anyone who does not follow the
accepted norms is considered odd and queer. The average
person feels that since everyone thinks so, says so and does so,
it must be right. That is how souls are lost and how society
perpetuates its prejudices and its evils.
A few days after the members of the General Assembly
of the United Nations had given Yassir Arafat, the leader of
the murderous P.L.O., a royal welcome, U.S. Ambassador
Scali addressed that same body and spoke of "the tyranny of
the majority" as a threat to the survival of the U.N. and the
peace of the world. This is another way of describing "the
tyranny of Sodom" and "following the multitude to do evil."
If there is to be a future for the world, man will have to
muster his cumulative wisdom and courage to shun the bed
of Sodom, and to refuse to stampede with the herd to do evil.
|