WHEN THE CITIES of Sodom and Gomorrah were
destroyed, only Lot, his wife and two daughters survived.
As these four people were escaping from the holocaust,
Lot's wife turned around to look at the flaming cities "And
she became a pillar of salt" (Gen. 19:26).
What grave sin did she commit to deserve so swift and
severe a punishment? The sages explain that Lot's wife, like
the people of Sodom, was heartless. She despised the poor
and refused to welcome the stranger. "On the night that the
angels visited Lot (in the shape of men), what did she do?
She went about to all her neighbors and asked them, 'Give
me salt, as we have guests,' her intention being that the
townspeople should become aware of their presence (and
drive them from town). Therefore, she became a pillar of salt"
(Gen. Rab. 51:5).
Another version has it that when Lot brought a poor man
to the house for a meal, she would willfully make the food so
salty that it was no longer edible. She thus discouraged
anyone from coming to her home for help. Her sin was
hard-heartedness and greed. She lived an isolated and
selfish life and her punishment: was midah k'neged midah
--"measure for measure." "And she became a pillar of salt."
The difference between bread and salt can be explained
in the following manner. Bread is universally considered a
staple food, and man can subsist on it. A meal in Hebrew is
referred to as "eating bread." For this reason the recitation of
Hamotzi on bread usually absolves one from repeating
benedictions on the rest of the food.
Salt, on the other hand, cannot and does not constitute a
meal. It is useful only when it is combined with other ingredients,
but is useless--even harmful--when eaten by itself.
The difference in the symbolism of bread and salt is
expressed in their Hebrew spelling. The word for bread is
lechem and the word for salt is melach .
Both words have the identical three letters-- mem, lamed,
chet . The difference is that lechem begins with
lamed, and melach begins with mem .
When the lamed is used as a prefix, it means
"to, toward, or drawing near." Thus lahem means
"to them," lanu --"to us," le'elokim --"toward God." When people eat lechem together, it usually signifies
that they are becoming closer and friendlier with each other.
To this day we speak of "breaking bread" with someone,
by which a spirit of goodwill and cooperation is promoted
and enhanced.
The word melach for salt, represents the very
opposite of lechem . It begins with the letter mem ,
which, at the beginning of a word, implies to draw away or
to remove oneself from something or someone. Thus mimenu
means "from him," mikem --"from them,"
me'elokim --"away from God."
The poor people came to the home of Lot seeking lechem
and all that it represents--warmth, compassion, friendship,
but MRs. Lot, through an over-abundance of melach ,
treated them with callousness, cruelty and disdain. Even when
she managed to escape from the holocaust of Sodom, she
expressed no sentiments of grief, experienced no pangs of
anguish or feelings of remorse. She turned around and watched
her neighbors roasting in the furnace and remained unmoved
by the catastrophe. Her punishment came devastatingly and
fast. And the sages say that it fitted the crime. Be,elach
chatah ubemelach lakta . "By salt she sinned and by salt
she was smitten" (Rashi Gen. 19: 26). Her sin was self-
centeredness and cruelty, and her punishment was that
she was forever to remain a pillar of melach .
In the Mishnah we are told that one who follows the
principle of sheli sheli , "Mine is Mine," is a disciple
of the people of Sodom (Ethics of the Fathers 5:13). The slogan
of the inhabitants of Sodom was, "Each one for himself.
Don't do anything for others." It is against such an attitude
that Jewish law requires to wash one's hands (mayim achronim) after partaking of a meal, to rid oneself of melach sodomit
shemesamo et ho'enayim , of "the salt of Sodom which blinds
the eyes" (Chulin 105b; Erubin 17b). The sages wished to
impress us with a lesson in sharing. When one enjoys food, he
should not act like the people of Sodom, but should remember
the hungry, poor, and the needy stranger.
Abraham, the Founder of our people, was the great teacher
of the doctrine of lechem . When God appeared before
Abraham, the patriarch left the presence of the Divine visitor in
order to welcome and feed three unexpected guests. By this
deed he taught that gedolah bakhnasat orhim yoter
mekabalat pnei hashechinah , that it is more important to
take care of human guests than even welcoming God (Sab. 127a).
One Friday evening the sainted Chafetz Chayim
invited several poor guests to his home for the Sabbath meal.
It is customary to chant Shalom Aleichem , a beautiful
song of welcome, in honor of the angels of peace who frequent
Jewish homes on the eve of the Sabbath. On arriving at his home,
the Chafetz Chayim proceeded immediately to recite the
kiddush and to eat the meal, and chanted Shalom
Aleichem at the conclusion of the dinner. When asked to
explain why he had deviated from the time-hallowed practice of
chanting the song of welcome before partaking of food, he said,
"I knew that the poor men I had invited were very hungry and were
eager to eat, but dee malachim zeinen doch nisht hungerig
oon kennen varten --the angels weren't hungry and could
wait."
The Chafetz Chayim and many others, were merely
following the example of Abraham. They were practicing the ideal
of lamed in lechem and shunning the cruel
philosophy of mem in melach of Sodom.
I recommend that we do the same.
|