THE JEWISH CODE of ethics teaches that when a man is
hard-pressed and his business is in bad shape, it is wrong to
take advantage of his precarious financial condition and buy
him out at a cheap price. How surprising is it therefore to
read in the Bible that Jacob was unmindful of this principle
and pressed his brother Esau to sell the birthright for the
price of a pot of pottage. We are told in the sidrah
that when Esau returned from a hunting trip, tired and hungry,
and said to his brother Jacob, "Let me swallow, I pray thee,
some of this red, red pottage, for I am faint" (Gem 25:30),
Jacob took advantage of the situation, drove a hard bargain
and bought his brother's birthright.
Anti-semites have exploited this biblical episode to malign
and vilify the Jew. "See!" they cry with glee. "See, this is the
way the Jew does business. Even Jacob, one of their
Patriarchs, was inconsiderate and unscrupulous in his dealings.
He forced a famished brother to sell his birthright for a pot of
soup." And, sad to say, some of our own people are mouthing
this bit of slander.
Some who make these charges conveniently overlook,
while others are ignorant of, a pertinent fact. The birthright did
not provide Jacob with any material advantages. It merely
made him the spiritual successor of his father and grandfather.
That is why the spiritual-minded Jacob was eager to buy it,
and why the materialistic Esau was willing to sell it.
It is not the purpose of this sermon to apologize for
Jacob or to defend Jewish business practices. Regardless
of what our detractors think or say, I am convinced that as
a group we are at lease as honest in our dealings as are
our non-Jewish neighbors. In the Watergate scandal that
rocked the nation to its very foundations there were no Jews
involved. What I am trying to do is to explain this biblical
incident and to apply its meaning for our time.
The Bible is a book that cannot be read superficially;
it has to be studied. One word will sometimes supply the
background and shed the proper light on an event. In this
instance the crucial word is kayom , "in this day."
A careful analysis of the sentence reveals that the word is
superfluous. "Sell me your birthright" would have been
sufficient. What need is there for kayont ?
What about "this day"? Apparently something extraordinary
happened that day that spurred Jacob on to deprive Esau
of the birthright. What was it? Furthermore, since when did
Jacob become a cook, preparing soup for the family?
The Torah describes him as a yoshev oholim ,
as one who continuously studied in the tent. What suddenly
brought him into the kitchen to cook, of all things, lentil soup?
The explanation is to be found in the word kayom .
That was a bleak and memorable day, indeed! For on that day
Abraham passed away, and the world was cast into deep
mourning and gloom. When the news spread, statesmen and
dignitaries of many tribes came to the home of Abraham
crying, "Woe to the world that lost its leader! Woe to the ship
that lost in captain! " (Baba Batra 91b).
One can well imagine the shocked state of Isaac and
Rebecca. The crown of their heads, the glory of their lives
was gone. People from all walks of life, even strangers,
thronged to pay final tribute to the greatest and most
beloved figure of their generation. Everyone was there;
everyone but Esau. Jacob searched for him in the crowd,
but no one had seen his brother.
After the funeral, Jacob went home to prepare for the
mourners meal consisting of lentils, in keeping with the
tradition that mourners are to be given foods that have a
round shape, to indicate that the world is like a wheel that
spins, and that no one can truly console the bereaved in
the early days of bereavement and sorrow (Exodus Rab. 63:14).
While Jacob was busy with that painful chore, Esau
dashed in min hasadeh , "from the field" in hunting
clothes, with bows and arrows on his back. On the day when
many were weeping and bemoaning the great loss of the Patriarch,
Esau was out in the field enjoying his favorite sport. He was
unmindful and disinterested in all that had transpired on that
historic day. He had worked up a voracious appetite in the
forest and the field, and he wanted to eat.
Jacob, was shocked and ashamed. How could a grandson
of Abraham be so brutally cold concerning the death of his
grandfather? Evidently the passing of the benefactor of
humanity and the spiritual teacher and guide, not only of his
household but of the world. meant nothing to Esau. In that
moment Jacob resolved to get the birthright-- kayom
--because of what happened on that fateful day. No Esau
was to succeed to the spiritual leadership of Abraham.
No crass and morally callous hunter was to become the
third Patriarch of a future "kingdom of priests and holy nation."
And so Jacob took matters in his own hands and bought the
birthright kayom , because of the unusual occurrences
of that day.
We have just lived through another tragic episode that
began on a crucial kayom --on the day of Yom Kippur
1973, when the State of Israel was attacked and many sons
of Abraham were slaughtered. Once again Esau has revealed
his true colors by his callous lack of sympathy and
disinterestedness and hostility. By and large the so-called
spiritual leaders of the world have responded to this wanton
act of bestiality and barbarism with a shattering silence. We
can only hope and pray that Jacob will step forward and
evince his feelings of compassion in accordance with the
dictates that the birthright imposes an him and on his
descendants.
|